2014 Mercedes-Benz S-Class – NEW Technology Information Video
With the three engineering priorities “Intelligent Drive”, “Efficient Technology” and “Essence of Luxury”, the new Mercedes-Benz S-Class extends the boundari…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Eli Finkel, who earned his BA from Northwestern University in 1997 and a PhD from UNC-Chapel Hill in 2001, is a professor of psychology and professor of mana…
Video Rating: 5 / 5
Insurance companies disliked the video
So this is why the new car is so expensive.
all these systems will fail in Indian roads
Lady Diana Died in a Mercedes !!
damn, there so many detectors, radios, monitoring systems I didn’t even
thinked about before. I bet the next S class will slap you if you will
drive dangerously
ye you think we all are that rich to have afford to this car… so
unneccery .. if you want everyone to be safe on road make those car
cheaper..
This is not car , this is spaceship !
the car lacks a bitch that can suck your cock while driving. mercedes
should see to providing one
Is this technology avaliable in G65
what happend if iam in the suitation like a pursuit or a thieve is in front
of me with a gun and i need to run over him?
When are they gonna make cars already that cleans bird shit by it self.
the adv. “chicken head” was a bad decision by Mercedes,, fail to sale it
worldwide.
also, CL design change was a bad call by the company.
imagine driving this car in india/china with all the pre collision warnings
on
Mercedes-Benz. The best or nothing.
Respect Mercedes Benz nearly 120 years in business the best car in the
world always engineers who built mercedes invent the best,safety features
that no one else can offer so it’s obvious that this car is the best and is
top safe car to drive to date
Respect for the best of the best number 1 Mercedes always !!!
Awesome ……………………………Good use of technology keepit up
that moment when money talks 😀
free nice
nice car
sounds kinda gay the car stops when ever it says to stop? wtf so if you
wanna hit someone you wont be able to cause this car stopped you from it
Is there a video like this for the C-class?
Best Car Ever
sounds great mercedes but if you really want to make this car much better
put off button or override of some kind…i can see all these features
getting really annoying
These technologies looks like for learners…
i know how to drive the car dude..
Technology should be developed so that it reaches people easily and
offordable.
The best intelligent drive is the Driver inside the car..
Damn! Did I just watch a car commercial or a commercial for thw next gen
fighter jets?
S-class: One step ahead.
Tinder
“new advances in psychology and technology can be leveraged to create a
vastly more effective matchmaking algorithm!”
I agree with Dr. Finkel, although big data dating IS NOT the key to
long-lasting romance.
Personality traits are highly stable in persons over 25 to 45 years old
(the group of persons who could be most interested in serious online dating)
The key to long-lasting romance is STRICT PERSONALITY SIMILARITY.
WorldWide, there are over 5,000 (five thousand) online dating sites
but no one is using the 16PF (or similar) to assess personality of its
members!
but no one calculates similarity with a quantized pattern comparison method!
but no one can show Compatibility Distribution Curves to each and every of
its members!
but no one is scientifically proven! No one can prove its matching
algorithm can match prospective partners who will have more stable and
satisfying relationships than couples matched by chance, astrological
destiny, personal preferences, searching on one’s own, or other technique
as the control group in a peer_reviewed Scientific Paper for the majority
(over 90%) of their members.
Actual online dating sites offering compatibility matching methods, when
calculating compatibility between prospective mates, have less or at least
the same precision as searching on one’s own. [in the range of 3 or 4
persons compatible per 1,000 persons screened]
* That is because they use:
a) simplified versions of personality traits, instead of the 16PF5 or
similar with the complete inventory (16 variables)
b) inadequate quantitative methods to calculate compatibility between
prospective mates.
The Big Five normative personality test is obsolete, it has been proven as
an incomplete and incorrect model of personality.
The HEXACO (a.k.a. Big Six) is another oversimplification. Online Dating
sites have very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000 (twenty million)
profiles, so the Big Five model or the HEXACO model are not enough for
predictive purposes.
To solve that problem I propose:
1) the 16PF or similar normative personality test to measure personality of
normal persons over 26 years old interested in serious dating.
No actual online dating site offering compatibility matching methods uses
the 16PF5 normative test available in different languages.
2) a new quantitative method to calculate compatibility between prospective
mates, based on quantized pattern comparison (part of pattern recognition
by correlation) to achieve far more precision than searching on one’s own
[in the range of 3 persons compatible per 100,000 persons screened, 100
times more precise / more powerful than actual matching algorithms]