Particle Physics Foundations of Dark Matter-Dark Energy-and Inflatio Resubida
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VmXZn702v0&fs=1&rel=0]
Particle Physics Foundations of Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Inflation (1/3) © CERN Kolb, Edward (Rocky) (speaker) (University of Chicago) CERN. Geneva Acad…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Fascinating!
using it in my class
cern 6 6 6 :))
amazing
07:38 Talk to a climate scientist’s, they’re the ones that use models. The
models used in economics (financial markets /credit crisis causing) were
developed by old Cold war physicists looking for new projects. Basic
economics models would explain why the theatre is more than half empty,
demand. The supply is great, great lecture.
Exactly you wrapped it up very early. Every action has an opposite
reaction. So if everything outside of dark matter is either a positive
action or a negative reaction. Then dark matter is the opposite of either
force. That can only leave dark matter to be the yet to be created positive
and negative charges. Which leaves dark matter linked to the big bang. The
big bang is an explosion set off by a single positive charge. Leaving dark
matter to be an implosion. So the big bang was set off by the creator who
is good and creates life. Dark matter is evil an implosion brining the big
bang together so tight to nothing. Now you get God-Devil. So indeed dark
matter is an reaction that causes death of all.
amazing video
I like this presentation. Very interesting.
Lecture is fine. But I HATE HATE HATE the smart guys that recorded the
video showing benches and doors and all other irrelevent things and.. Why
cant they show less of walls and chairs and more of slides? Best way to
make a video is to have the professor at a corner and slides in the major
part of the video. the recordidng of it is sooo bad that it bored me mid
way through and I stopped watching it
X space does not like Y space
Particle/matter
How about nano-black-holes having as much gravitational mass attraction as
a proton has electrostatic attraction to an electron, 3.8 Gton, which would
mean such a nano-black-hole attaches (‘swallows’) an already-heavy proton
and then captures an electron and ‘hides’ in plain sight, or sinks in
plain-sight, passing through Earth masses and suns but not through denser
stars…speaking of which, Can they determine the amount of “dark matter”
already swallowed by our Milky Way central black hole…and is there a
clean zone around that…?
(My theory-favorite of-course is the neutral-electron a
non-annihilated-positron+electron.)
Mmmmmm.
48:41 – this man is an ATHEIST! the passion he invokes in condemning
miracles is inspiring!
We can search for ever DM/DE but won’t find it cause it does not exist, is
another dream built by theoretical physics same like “the big-bang matter
comes from nothing” http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.3960
The best way to explain DM/DE is with Modified Newtonian Dynamics
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.3960v2.pdf
I wanted a joke about black holes !
☻/ This is Bob. Copy and paste him
/▌ all over youtube
/ so he can take over
and return the old comment section
“All the forces of nature are formed by E2 a locational spherical inward
absorption density 4pi + and -outward emission density 2pi of
electromagnetic waves, forming antimatter matter annihilation, forming +
and -electric charge and EM-fields, or resonance and interference now as
time unfolds from an individual 3D centred ref-frame. E2 inward spherical
wave’s compress + and -outward wave’s now expand from Planck’s constant the
shortest unit of measurable time radiating C2 from an object.”
I’m happier listening and learning (or trying to) than shouting my
‘intuitive’ ideas into others’ ears. Intuition and common sense are enemies
today if you want to learn or teach. One mouth, two ears for a reason,
folks I can proudly proclaim that I find science interesting and
magnificently incomprehensible Unlike some here, I claim no answers; but
some of y’all need to stop your swinging at the moon with a tennis racket.
We are still children, all of us. to the mystery that is ‘reality’..
“The gravity of a star works AGAINST it’s escaping light.” Yes. This
reduces the light’s energy, which is a red shift. At a black hole, the
light expends *all* of its energy and cannot escape. If gravity was the
cause of redshifts, the redshifts would never change, and there could be no
measured *acceleration* (which means redshift increasing with time).
Additionally, measurements of time dilation accord with special relativity,
which means the objects *really are* moving away.
NEATO completeo!…but, i need some help understanding… like a step
ladder from the easy to understand PBS programs and this academic guy.. hmm
Hmm, you’re hinting at M-Theory. The idea is analogous to each universe
being fundamentally like a “membrane” of a specific property of energy much
like a specific EM carrier wave. There’s no reason that if any 2 universes
were to “overlap” and have points where their particular frequencies were
close enough that something like constructive interference would account
for particle or alternate energy formation occurring.