String Theory
String Theory I created this video with the YouTube Video Editor (http://www.youtube.com/editor) quantum, quantum physics, quantum physic, quantum mechanic, quantum mechanics, quantum break,…
“The Fabric of the Cosmos” based on the book by renowned physicist and author Brian Greene, takes us to the frontiers of physics to see how scientists are piecing together the most complete…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
*The Birth and Short Life of the First String Theory.*
Baggins: What have I got in my pocket?
Gollum: What’s it got in its pocketses? Not a fair question!
Baggins: What have I got in my pocket?
Gollum: Fisheses.
Baggins: No.
*Gollum: String!*
*Baggins: No.*
The end.
Ok so the big bang is the universe that was once compresed into a very tiny
space and then started expanding… Right? And as the video said very
logically, it was a very dense point, We know black holes are very dense as
well, couldnt it be that big bangs is what happen inside black holes, which
start the expancion of other universes in other dimensions? Since we dont
know what lies beyond the event horizon and both the the universe before
its expancion (the big bang) and black holes have infite density in a very
small place, i dont know if im properly stating my point but its just an
idea that passed through my mind as i was watching the video and its been
bugging me all day… I may be completely wrong but think about it…. This
explains the multiverse perfectly
Dr. Brian Greene who is narrating is an outstanding teacher. This is an
excellent video – thank you for all the research, time, and effort that
went into putting this lecture together and sharing it with the community,
Ciao, L
This is what spiritualists, channelers and Buddhists found out through
meditation already centuries ago. I can show you channeled material from
the 60ties that already contains this information.
If only someone listened to them. If only scientists and spiritualists
worked together, we would advance so quickly.
Particles are complete BS. Sending a particle doesn’t pull things together.
It might work in mathematics, because everything can work in mathematics.
But for there to be a field made out of particles, there have to be a
nother field guiding the particle. To asume particles by them selves can do
the job is as stupid as the example when he throws a ball at a nother
person and they get pulled together. The field which exists beyond
particles could be what they missinterpret as new particles. A field could
fluctuate, twist, bend and behave in such ways that it looks different in
different contexts. If we then asumes it to be made out of isolated
particle, with unchangeable properties, because we asume the highly
unscientific notion that the laws of the universe are made out of
constants. Then we might end up with lots of BS particles.
If you force one type of theory upon a nother type of theory, even if they
do not work with one and a nother, you will end up with hundreds of
parameters. Some of them invented to explain why the universe isn’t burning
in to a fundemental particle plasma with infinite energies, and other
parameters tat just derive from the missunderstanding of that they are all
one and the same.
String theory is the atempt to make everything in to one single thing,
instead of a single particle for every situation. But It does it the
unscientific way. The particle physics and QM wasn’t scientific to start
with, so just to add a random equation that happened to explain something,
doesn’t make it scientific, even if we could ben the math till it explains
everything we find to be real and we believe to be real.
String theory is a explain everything theory. It is invented to explain
everything and be open to so much change that you can’t question it
theoretically. It doesn’t solve any theoretical problems, it just takes
every theory a raps it up in duct tape. It makes so that every theory that
does not work with one and a nother, to apear as if the actualy do. It is
the destruction of the scientific method.
Burde være obligatorisk for alle med mer en 2 hjerneceller, selv om den
ikke er helt oppdatert. Tipper den er 10 år gammel ca (De snakker om søken
etter Higs Bossom og at Cern bygger en maskin som vil være klar om 6-7
år….)
God is one complex dude
What was Euler looking for when he came up with his equation?
i’d like to think our universe may very well have come into existence from
nothing. before our universe begins, there’s no law of physics at all.
rules like “law of conservation of energy” didn’t have to apply to it.
The String Theory
The video is full of explanatory metaphors to facilitate understanding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCkGD76OEwA
*Gandalf visits the hobbit*
-Hello there! I wanna share an adventure do you…?
-No
-No? Ok bye
~The End~
That’s right. Nature is made by strings.
Im athiest, but when i think about it wouldnt whatever force that created
everything be considered a god?
This is really cool. String theory units all. But how long will it be
before some one else comes along with a new theory that agrees with all the
maths and equally units everything?
Also, a little off topic, but if we were thrown far enough away from the
big bang, theoretically wouldn’t we eventually be able to see it happen
with a big enough telescope?
O.K. ! = gravity is time waves = mountains and valleys = cosmic and gamma
rays produce matter
particles
String Theory??? I think they mean String Hypothesis? Something you can’t
falsify you can never call a theory? So what is the difference between this
String Hypothesis and religion?
It is so annoying when people on these videos try to explain
hard-to-imagine theories through our day-to-day experience. Were they like
our day-to-day experience like those stupid examples with the slices of
bread or the jelly, there would not be any need to explain them. If someone
can’t grasp an idea without being given a childish example, then physics is
simply not for them.
If gravitons could pass into neighbouring branes, why dont we see large
scale anomalies like gravity that come from nothing since it originates
from the next brane?
Funny how toward the end they say it’s a possibility that all they’ve been
working on has been a waste of time. The voyage toward proving string
theory correct has made scientists able to see things in a whole new light.
I see it that it’s better to see things in different ways than to see
things all the time in the exact same way forever.
Creating something out of nothing. Is impossible, but only to an organism
that has evolved allways through creation. Over a billion years of creation
only created by sex survival of the fittest. Makes it impossible in our
nature. To articulate the mechanics of the universe. Mabey to answer the
question how can you create something out of nothing is as simple as easy
as saying. There is no such thing as nothing. There has always been
something.
String Theory: https://youtu.be/cCkGD76OEwA
String Theory: https://youtu.be/cCkGD76OEwA
Three thousand likes. ‘Jesus appeared to me in a sandwich’ or ‘Fake ass of
pop star compilation’ get millions. The human race does not deserve to
survive.
نظرية الاوتار لاينشتاين
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCkGD76OEwA
*The Birth and Short Life of the First String Theory.*
Baggins: What have I got in my pocket?
Gollum: What’s it got in its pocketses? Not a fair question!
Baggins: What have I got in my pocket?
Gollum: Fisheses.
Baggins: No.
*Gollum: String!*
*Baggins: No.*
The end.
Ok so the big bang is the universe that was once compresed into a very tiny
space and then started expanding… Right? And as the video said very
logically, it was a very dense point, We know black holes are very dense as
well, couldnt it be that big bangs is what happen inside black holes, which
start the expancion of other universes in other dimensions? Since we dont
know what lies beyond the event horizon and both the the universe before
its expancion (the big bang) and black holes have infite density in a very
small place, i dont know if im properly stating my point but its just an
idea that passed through my mind as i was watching the video and its been
bugging me all day… I may be completely wrong but think about it…. This
explains the multiverse perfectly
Dr. Brian Greene who is narrating is an outstanding teacher. This is an
excellent video – thank you for all the research, time, and effort that
went into putting this lecture together and sharing it with the community,
Ciao, L
This is what spiritualists, channelers and Buddhists found out through
meditation already centuries ago. I can show you channeled material from
the 60ties that already contains this information.
If only someone listened to them. If only scientists and spiritualists
worked together, we would advance so quickly.
Particles are complete BS. Sending a particle doesn’t pull things together.
It might work in mathematics, because everything can work in mathematics.
But for there to be a field made out of particles, there have to be a
nother field guiding the particle. To asume particles by them selves can do
the job is as stupid as the example when he throws a ball at a nother
person and they get pulled together. The field which exists beyond
particles could be what they missinterpret as new particles. A field could
fluctuate, twist, bend and behave in such ways that it looks different in
different contexts. If we then asumes it to be made out of isolated
particle, with unchangeable properties, because we asume the highly
unscientific notion that the laws of the universe are made out of
constants. Then we might end up with lots of BS particles.
If you force one type of theory upon a nother type of theory, even if they
do not work with one and a nother, you will end up with hundreds of
parameters. Some of them invented to explain why the universe isn’t burning
in to a fundemental particle plasma with infinite energies, and other
parameters tat just derive from the missunderstanding of that they are all
one and the same.
String theory is the atempt to make everything in to one single thing,
instead of a single particle for every situation. But It does it the
unscientific way. The particle physics and QM wasn’t scientific to start
with, so just to add a random equation that happened to explain something,
doesn’t make it scientific, even if we could ben the math till it explains
everything we find to be real and we believe to be real.
String theory is a explain everything theory. It is invented to explain
everything and be open to so much change that you can’t question it
theoretically. It doesn’t solve any theoretical problems, it just takes
every theory a raps it up in duct tape. It makes so that every theory that
does not work with one and a nother, to apear as if the actualy do. It is
the destruction of the scientific method.
Burde være obligatorisk for alle med mer en 2 hjerneceller, selv om den
ikke er helt oppdatert. Tipper den er 10 år gammel ca (De snakker om søken
etter Higs Bossom og at Cern bygger en maskin som vil være klar om 6-7
år….)
God is one complex dude
What was Euler looking for when he came up with his equation?
i’d like to think our universe may very well have come into existence from
nothing. before our universe begins, there’s no law of physics at all.
rules like “law of conservation of energy” didn’t have to apply to it.
could it be that universe is like lungs constantly expanding and then
shrinking to the point it expolodes again
The String Theory
The video is full of explanatory metaphors to facilitate understanding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCkGD76OEwA
*Gandalf visits the hobbit*
-Hello there! I wanna share an adventure do you…?
-No
-No? Ok bye
~The End~
That’s right. Nature is made by strings.
Im athiest, but when i think about it wouldnt whatever force that created
everything be considered a god?
This is really cool. String theory units all. But how long will it be
before some one else comes along with a new theory that agrees with all the
maths and equally units everything?
Also, a little off topic, but if we were thrown far enough away from the
big bang, theoretically wouldn’t we eventually be able to see it happen
with a big enough telescope?
O.K. ! = gravity is time waves = mountains and valleys = cosmic and gamma
rays produce matter
particles
String Theory??? I think they mean String Hypothesis? Something you can’t
falsify you can never call a theory? So what is the difference between this
String Hypothesis and religion?
It is so annoying when people on these videos try to explain
hard-to-imagine theories through our day-to-day experience. Were they like
our day-to-day experience like those stupid examples with the slices of
bread or the jelly, there would not be any need to explain them. If someone
can’t grasp an idea without being given a childish example, then physics is
simply not for them.
If gravitons could pass into neighbouring branes, why dont we see large
scale anomalies like gravity that come from nothing since it originates
from the next brane?
Funny how toward the end they say it’s a possibility that all they’ve been
working on has been a waste of time. The voyage toward proving string
theory correct has made scientists able to see things in a whole new light.
I see it that it’s better to see things in different ways than to see
things all the time in the exact same way forever.
Creating something out of nothing. Is impossible, but only to an organism
that has evolved allways through creation. Over a billion years of creation
only created by sex survival of the fittest. Makes it impossible in our
nature. To articulate the mechanics of the universe. Mabey to answer the
question how can you create something out of nothing is as simple as easy
as saying. There is no such thing as nothing. There has always been
something.
String Theory: https://youtu.be/cCkGD76OEwA
String Theory: https://youtu.be/cCkGD76OEwA
Three thousand likes. ‘Jesus appeared to me in a sandwich’ or ‘Fake ass of
pop star compilation’ get millions. The human race does not deserve to
survive.